Routespring Logo

Why Enterprise Travel Solutions Fail at Mid-Market Companies

Travel Management

Why Enterprise Travel Solutions Fail at Mid-Market Companies

As a company grows, it hits a critical inflection point in its travel program. The unmanaged, chaotic process of employees booking on their own becomes untenable, and the need for a professional travel management solution becomes clear. At this stage, many mid-market companies (those with roughly 100 to 1,000 employees) begin the process of evaluating Travel Management Companies (TMCs). They are often approached by the large, global "mega-TMCs" that service the Fortune 500. These enterprise-level providers present a compelling picture of a powerful, all-encompassing global solution.

The problem is, this enterprise model is often a terrible fit for the needs of a dynamic, fast-growing mid-market company. The very things that make a TMC successful at serving a massive, bureaucratic organization—a highly structured process, complex configuration options, a focus on rigid compliance—are the exact things that make them a poor choice for a more agile business. A mid-market company that signs a contract with a legacy enterprise TMC often finds itself trapped in an expensive, inflexible system that creates more problems than it solves. It's like trying to use an industrial power tool for a delicate home repair project; it's the wrong tool for the job.

This guide will break down the key reasons why enterprise travel solutions typically fail at mid-market companies and will outline what these growing businesses should actually be looking for in a travel management partner.

1. Crushing Complexity and Slow Implementation

Enterprise travel platforms are built to serve the complex needs of massive, multi-national corporations. They are designed to handle thousands of cost centers, hundreds of different travel policies, and the intricate legal requirements of dozens of countries. This makes them incredibly powerful, but also incredibly complex.

  • The Problem: The implementation process for these systems is notoriously long and difficult. It can take six to twelve months and requires a dedicated internal project team to manage the complex configuration. The software itself is often not intuitive, requiring extensive and ongoing training for both administrators and travelers.
  • Why it Fails for Mid-Market: A mid-market company does not have the time or the dedicated resources for a year-long implementation project. They need to be agile. They need a solution that can be up and running in weeks, not years. The complexity of the enterprise tool creates a huge administrative burden that a smaller company's lean team cannot support.

2. A Clunky, Outdated User Experience

Many enterprise booking tools were designed 15-20 years ago. While they may have been "bolted on" with a more modern-looking interface, the underlying technology is often old, slow, and clunky.

  • The Problem: Employees are used to the fast, seamless experience of consumer travel sites. When they are forced to use a corporate tool that is difficult to navigate and offers a poor selection of options, they will not use it.
  • Why it Fails for Mid-Market: Low user adoption is a killer for any travel program. It leads to "rogue spending" and a complete loss of visibility. While a massive enterprise might be able to enforce compliance through sheer top-down authority, a mid-market company relies more on a culture of buy-in. If the official tool is a pain to use, your employees will simply go back to booking on their own, and your investment in the program will be wasted. The real reason for low adoption is often a poor value proposition for the traveler.

3. Rigid, Inflexible Service Models

Enterprise TMCs are built like large battleships. They are powerful, but they are not nimble. Their service models and contracts are designed for the scale and predictability of a massive corporation.

  • The Problem: These TMCs often require long-term contracts (3-5 years) with significant minimum spending commitments. Their service model is highly structured, and any request for customization or a change to the standard process can be slow and expensive.
  • Why it Fails for Mid-Market: A growing mid-market company needs a partner that can adapt with them. They need a flexible contract, transparent pricing, and a service model that can evolve as their business changes. Being locked into a rigid, multi-year contract with a legacy TMC can stifle a growing company's ability to be agile.

4. You Are a Small Fish in a Very Large Pond

For an enterprise TMC, the primary focus is on their multi-million dollar global accounts. A mid-market company, even with a respectable travel spend, is simply not their top priority.

  • The Problem: Your company is likely to be assigned to a more junior account manager. Your requests for support or customization will be a lower priority than those from their flagship clients. You will not get the strategic, proactive partnership you need to optimize your program.
  • Why it Fails for Mid-Market: A mid-market company needs a travel partner who views them as a key client. They need a dedicated account manager who is invested in their success and who can provide strategic guidance. With a mega-TMC, you are often just a number.

What Mid-Market Companies Should Look For Instead

Growing companies need a travel management solution that is agile, modern, user-friendly, and designed for their scale. They should look for a "tech-first" provider that prioritizes a great user experience and automation over a heavy, manual service model.

1. An All-in-One, Integrated Platform Look for a single platform that unifies travel, expense, and payment. A system like Routespring is built from the ground up to be a seamless, integrated solution, which eliminates the manual work and data silos that plague older systems.

2. A Focus on User Experience The booking tool must be as intuitive and easy to use as a consumer travel site. This is the key to driving the high user adoption that is essential for a successful program. A platform designed for the modern user will feel familiar and require minimal training.

3. Fast, Simple Implementation A modern, cloud-based platform should be able to be implemented in a matter of weeks, not months. The provider should offer a dedicated implementation specialist who can guide you through a simple, structured onboarding process.

4. Transparent and Flexible Pricing Look for a provider with a clear, easy-to-understand pricing model, preferably with no long-term contracts. Many modern platforms offer tiered pricing that can scale with your business, including affordable or even free entry-level plans.

5. A Partnership Approach to Service Choose a provider who will treat you like a valued partner. You should have a dedicated account manager who is focused on your success and who will provide proactive, data-driven advice on how to optimize your travel program.

The needs of a mid-market company are unique. Avoid the temptation to go with the biggest name in the industry. Instead, choose a modern, agile partner who provides a solution that is built for your scale, your culture, and your future growth.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. When is a company ready to move from an unmanaged program to a managed one? A common trigger point is when you can no longer easily track your travel spend or when your finance and admin teams are spending a significant amount of time on travel-related tasks. If you have more than 20-30 employees who travel with any regularity, you will almost certainly see a significant ROI from implementing a managed travel platform.

2. Our company is growing fast and will be an enterprise soon. Shouldn't we just start with an enterprise solution? This is a common mistake. A modern, scalable platform is a much better choice. A platform like Routespring can serve you effectively as a 200-person company and can seamlessly scale with you as you grow to 2,000 employees and beyond. You don't need the crushing complexity of a legacy enterprise system to be "future-proof." You need an agile platform that can grow with you.

3. What is the difference between a "TMC" and a "travel management software platform"? Historically, a TMC was a service company that employed travel agents. A software platform was a technology product. Today, the lines have blurred. The best modern providers are technology companies at their core, offering a powerful software platform that is backed by expert human support. When you are evaluating options, you should be looking for a company that leads with technology, not with a manual service model.

4. How can we ensure our employees will adopt the new tool? The key is to solve their problems, not create new ones. A platform that is easy to use and, most importantly, eliminates the need for them to pay for travel out-of-pocket, will be eagerly adopted. When you show them that the new platform saves them time and hassle, adoption becomes a natural outcome.

5. How much should we expect to pay for a mid-market travel management solution? Pricing models vary, but you should look for a provider with transparent SaaS-based pricing. This might be a per-trip fee or a flat monthly or annual subscription fee. Be wary of providers with complex fee structures that include separate charges for implementation, support, and reporting. A modern platform should offer clear, predictable pricing that makes it easy to calculate your ROI.

Ready to Upgrade Your Business Travel?

Our all-in-one platform saves you time and money, while providing a world-class experience for your team. Get started in minutes.

Start Saving Today